LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA – Netflix recently released a new film called Society of the Snow, which depicts the tragic story of a plane crash in the Andes mountains on October 13, 1972. The crash took the lives of 29 passengers and 6 crewmembers, leaving only 16 survivors who endured extreme conditions before being rescued two and a half months later. The survivors were forced to resort to cannibalism to stay alive due to the lack of food and freezing temperatures in the snow.
After the film was introduced, many people took offense when media company LAD Bible referred to it as a “cannibal movie.” This sparked controversy among viewers, with some emphasizing that the film is a story of resilience and survival, not just about cannibalism. Many survivors and their families argued that the film portrays the human spirit’s ability to endure and survive under the most extreme circumstances.
Furthermore, commenters expressed disappointment that the film was considered a remake of the 1993 movie, Alive, which also portrayed the same plane crash incident. Some movie enthusiasts felt that the plot of Society of the Snow lacked originality and uniqueness, questioning why there was a need for another adaptation of the same real-life event. However, others defended the film, suggesting that it offered a different perspective and captured the emotional journey of the survivors in a way that Alive did not.
Overall, the release of Society of the Snow has sparked debate and divided opinions among viewers, prompting discussions about the portrayal of real-life tragedies in the film industry. The film serves as a reminder of the harrowing ordeal faced by the survivors of the 1972 plane crash, highlighting their resilience and strength in the face of adversity.