San Diego, CA — A San Diego man known for his TikTok persona, who was found guilty of murdering his estranged wife and her friend, had his sentencing delayed to September 6 after a court hearing on Friday. Ali Abulaban, 32, appeared visibly different from his trial appearances, showcasing a buzz cut and wearing jail attire as the defense requested more time before sentencing.
During the high-profile trial, Abulaban, who gained some fame under the moniker “JinnKid,” confessed to fatally shooting 28-year-old Ana Abulaban and 29-year-old Rayburn Cardenas Barron. The violent incident unfolded at the Spire San Diego, a luxurious high-rise apartment complex, in October 2021.
The jury, which deliberated starting May 24, faced the challenge of determining the degree of murder, concluding on a verdict of first-degree murder for both killings on May 29. Abulaban was also found guilty of special circumstance allegations of multiple murders, which intensifies the legal consequences due to the additional gravity of his crimes.
The prosecution portrayed the murders as premeditated, noting Abulaban’s actions leading up to the deadly encounter. Deputy District Attorney Taren Brast underscored the defendant’s calculated approach, including illegal entry into the apartment using a key card and setting up devices to spy on his wife. Graphic evidence and chilling audio from the scene were pivotal in showcasing the deliberate nature of the killings.
Abulaban’s defense attempted to mitigate the severity of his actions by highlighting his mental state and personal struggles. His attorney argued that Abulaban suffered from severe mental distress exacerbated by drug use and a tumultuous personal history, claiming these factors clouded his judgment during the murders.
The emotional toll of the proceedings was palpable, particularly for the families of the victims. Rayburn Barron’s sister expressed a somber relief following the verdict, acknowledging that while justice was served, it could not undo the loss they endured. She emphasized the permanence of Abulaban’s incarceration as a small solace in preventing future harm.
Legal experts note that cases involving claims of mental disturbances present complex challenges for the courts, balancing the need for justice with the nuances of individual psychological conditions. The outcome of this trial might set precedential considerations for how similar defenses are evaluated in the context of violent crimes.
As the new sentencing date approaches, the legal community and public alike await closure on this tragic case. The final decision will not only determine Abulaban’s fate but also contribute to the ongoing discussions about accountability, mental health, and justice in criminal proceedings.