“Killers” – the psychology behind why killers correspond with each other.

SALEM, Oregon – In December, it was revealed that Keith Jesperson, also known as the “Happy Face Killer,” had been corresponding with accused “Gilgo Beach 4 Killer,” Rex Heuermann, from his prison in Oregon. Jesperson, who had murdered eight women in the 1990s, told a podcaster that Heuermann had responded to his letters, stating that it was the only correspondence he had replied to. Jesperson had encouraged Heuermann to confess and avoid trial, citing the benefits of being in prison and the reduced media coverage.

Heuermann expressed gratitude for Jesperson’s letters, acknowledging that they had been a source of comfort to him, but he ultimately did not heed Jesperson’s advice and has yet to confess to any crimes. Jesperson’s need to publicize the correspondence suggests a desire for attention, as he has been out of the spotlight for some time. However, his claim to be mentoring newly accused killers is contradicted by his need to inform the media about his interactions with Heuermann.

This case is not unique, as other convicted killers have engaged in correspondence with their counterparts. Some have sought affirmation for their actions or even formed relationships. Furthermore, there are instances where aspiring killers have reached out to notorious murderers as role models, expressing their fascination and desire to emulate their actions. These cases highlight the psychological complexity of individuals who commit such heinous acts and their need for affirmation or belonging within a small, exclusive “club” of like-minded individuals.

The implications of these correspondences go beyond mere attention-seeking behavior. They can provide insight into the risk evaluation of aspiring killers, signaling a desire to emulate notorious criminals. This presents an opportunity for intervention and highlights the need for further understanding of the psychological motivations behind such interactions.

In conclusion, the exchange of letters between convicted killers sheds light on the complex psychological dynamics at play. It demonstrates the need for a deeper understanding of the motivations behind such correspondence and the potential for identifying and intervening in cases of aspiring killers seeking affirmation from notorious criminals. It is a challenge that requires careful evaluation and consideration in addressing the complex nature of criminal behavior and psychological motivations.