LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA – The “Miracle of the Andes” has captured the attention of filmmakers for decades, resulting in multiple adaptations of the harrowing story of survival after a plane crash. The most well-known adaptations are the 1976 film “Survive!” and the 1993 movie “Alive.” Now, the new film “Society of the Snow” has brought a fresh perspective to the story of the Uruguayan rugby team’s struggle for survival in the Andes.
Both “Alive” and “Society of the Snow” closely depict the events of Flight 571, with similar narratives of the crash, the attempt to survive, and the ultimate decision to resort to cannibalism. However, each film makes distinct narrative choices, setting them apart from each other. “Alive” opens and closes with a somewhat superfluous framing device, while “Society of the Snow” uses a more poetic but arguably confusing narrative structure.
Despite the differences in storytelling, both films capture the gripping sequence of events that unfolded after the crash. From the initial attempts to survive to the decision to consume the deceased passengers and the final walk to seek help, the core narrative remains consistent in both films.
“Alive” is directed by Frank Marshall, known for his work as a producer and for directing a handful of films. While competent, the direction of “Alive” is described as fairly workmanlike. “Society of the Snow,” on the other hand, brings a fresh perspective to the tale of survival, adding a spiritual element to the narrative through a poetic framing device and emphasizing the sacrifice of one of the characters.
In conclusion, while “Alive” and “Society of the Snow” offer different approaches to telling the compelling story of the Andes survivors, both films effectively portray the harrowing ordeal faced by the rugby team. The decision to adapt such a remarkable story into film reflects the enduring impact of the “Miracle of the Andes” on popular culture.